Personal Independence Commission |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special Team ReportPersonal Care (Lead Agency: DESE)Result Area: Common Application/Assessment Information & Common Release of Medical Information Draft of a general information form to be used by all agencies is in progress. It will be designed for automation after pilot testing. The process begins when a consumer requests assistance and concludes with being connected with the appropriate (community or state) services. To minimize repetition of information, consumer information in the redesigned system will be collected as needed and utilized and shared by multiple agencies per consumer authorization:
Transition from Institutions (Lead Agency: DMH)Result: Process for Transitioning Individuals with disabilities who are institutionalized and who are eligible for community-based treatment. Develop approaches to assist with funding the transition from institutions to community services and supports.
Transition from Institutions (Lead Agency: DMH)Result Area: Recommend any potential means of expanding home and community-based services or community-directed programs. Identify and alleviate barriers to community placement for "high risk" individuals.
Consumer Options Based on Needs, Choices, and Capacity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Action (What needs to be done to accomplish the result - key actions) |
Deliverables (How will we know if the action is complete) |
Responsible Agency & Person (Only one name per action) |
Due Date | Resources Existing and/or Needed | Measures or Indicators, if appropriate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Write the rule amendment and mail out the revision to Board of Health members | Amended rule with language concerning least restrictive environment | Nancie McAnaugh | 11/6/03 | Current Staff | Rule revision was filed with the Secretary of State's office |
Consumer Options Based on Needs, Choices, and Capacity
(including diversion strategies
(Lead Agency: DHSS)
Result Area: Work with MU-School of Nursing to Add Data Elements to the MDS Screening Form
Currently in Missouri the MDS only collects federal data elements. DHSS will work with MU to add state specific questions to the MDS screening form. For example, we do not know with any certainty why people choose to enter skilled nursing facilities. Is it because they could not find services in their local communities? Is it because they no longer had family members to help care for them? Were they informed of other options? Or, is it because it is the most appropriate placement for them at the time. By collecting data on why people enter nursing facilities it may be possible to identify gaps that may exist in our current service delivery system, and to develop programs to fill those gaps.
| Action (What needs to be done to accomplish the result - key actions) |
Deliverables (How will we know if the action is complete) |
Responsible Agency & Person (Only one name per action) | Due Date | Resources Existing and/or Needed | Measures or Indicators, if appropriate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meet with MU-School of Nursing concerning proposed changes to MDS | Modified MDS to include state-specific questions | Nancie McAnaugh | December 2003 | Current Staff | Currently in Negotiations, Next meeting scheduled for April 1, 2004 |
Consumer Options Based on Needs, Choices, and Capacity
(including diversion strategies)
(Lead Agency: DHSS)
Result Area: Transitional placement in habilitation centers
New admissions to state operated habilitation centers shall be considered time limited, unless the person is offered community services and chooses the habilitation center, the person has been admitted by the Court or has forensic status. Admission to the state operated habilitation center will be based on most critical need first. All new admissions to state operated habilitation centers shall be reviewed at thirty (30) days to determine if the person has a continued need for habilitation center services.
| Action (What needs to be done to accomplish the result - key actions) |
Deliverables (How will we know if the action is complete) |
Responsible Agency & Person (Only one name per action) |
Due Date | Resources Existing and/or Needed | Measures or Indicators, if appropriate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implement policy that approaches all placements in habilitation centers transitional placements. | Statewide Implementation of Policy | Anne Deaton, MRDD | 2004 | Existing Staff | Complete: Implemented 7/1/03 |
| Develop Evaluate tool for implementation & success of the habilitation center transitional placement policy | Recommendations to Anne Deaton from Management Advisory Team | Terry Jackson, MRDD | April 2004 | Existing Staff | On time |
Real Choices (Lead Agency: DSS)
Result Area: Streamline the system to assure easy and quick access to needed services and supports
| Action (What needs to be done to accomplish the result - key actions) |
Deliverables (How will we know if the action is complete) |
Responsible Agency & Person (Only one name per action) |
Due Date | Resources Existing and/or Needed | Measures or Indicators, if appropriate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review the DHSS TBI project and Voc. Rehab Project Success collectively, agree on modifications and give final approval to the development of data standards for electronic data dictionary | Document identifying the data elements/standards for the electronic data dictionary | Sandra Levels, DMS DHSS DMH DSS DOLIR DED OA-Office of Information Technology |
October 1, 2003 | To be discussed | 100% Complete |
| Participate with partner agencies in initial planning of the development of Project Assessment Quotation for the development of data standards necessary for common electronic data dictionary | Project Assessment Quotation to secure development costs of developing a multi-agency data dictionary that links with national XML standards | Faye Zumwalt, DHSS and Jan Grecian, OA DMH DSS DOLIR DED |
October 31, 2003 | MOU's for shared resources to fully develop the standards and a small pilot implementation project | 95% Complete: |
| Develop a plan to sustain ongoing training on Informed Choice | Plan for sustaining Informed Choice training | Sandra Levels, DMS Real Choices Grant |
December 2003 | Shared resources to be identified | 95% Complete: Scheduled training should be complete by April 04; Next Informed Choice team meeting scheduled for March 31 to discuss who will be responsible for ongoing sustainability. |
| Schedule training for Office of Community Placement | Plan to train | July 2004 | Action Plan Under Development |
* Action Plan Under Development: Many of the Actions encompass several steps that are not currently listed on the plan. The team is currently